BREAKING: RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) Has Come Out AGAIN Against the SAVE Act — What a SHOCK

 

BREAKING: RINO Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) Has Come Out AGAIN Against the SAVE Act — What a SHOCK

 Sen. Lisa Murkowski just proved once again why so many of us are fed up with RINOs in Alaska. She's opposing the SAVE America Act, the common-sense bill that demands real proof of citizenship to register for federal elections. Instead of protecting our votes from non-citizens, she's claiming it would "disenfranchise" hardworking Alaskans who supposedly can't get basic documents.

Give me a break. This isn't about rural challenges—it's about keeping the system easy to exploit. Every real American, from bush pilots to village residents, can handle showing a birth certificate or passport when it matters. We've made voting accessible for decades without sacrificing integrity, yet suddenly strict rules are impossible only when they stop potential fraud.

Murkowski's real fear is clear: secure elections mean no more hiding behind ranked-choice gimmicks or loose rules that let her cling to power. Time to demand better from our senators—pass the SAVE Act and put America First, no excuses. 

The photo is Senate theater: Lisa Murkowski at a hearing table, speaking — or in a frame caught mid-sentence — nameplate visible, expression sharpened by the lens. Above her, the headline does the real work: “RINO” on first reference, “AGAINST the SAVE Act” in caps, and a deadpan “What a SHOCK.” It’s not news so much as a label and a nudge.

The SAVE Act would require documentary proof of citizenship — like a passport or birth certificate — to register for federal elections. Republicans back it as election hygiene; voting-rights groups warn it would drop eligible voters who lack those papers handy, including married women with name changes, young people, rural Alaskans, and seniors. Murkowski’s office confirmed this week she still opposes the bill, citing Alaska’s small, spread-out communities and the risk of creating a two-tier system — registered and “need-to-find-my-file” — within families. That’s her past position, not new.

Why the photo feels pointed: Murkowski has voted against party leadership before (ACA repeal, Justice Kavanaugh, several Trump nominations and bills), and she holds her seat with a coalition that includes independents and Democrats thanks to Alaska’s ranked-choice system. To critics, “RINO” fits. To her voters, independence is the brand.

Does “again against SAVE” mean she dislikes election security? She backs other ID measures and voter-list maintenance; she just doesn’t want citizenship paperwork as a national registration gate. Opponents call that consequential; supporters call it federal overreach.

So yes, she’s against the SAVE Act. She was last Congress, too. The “shock” depends on whether you’ve been paying attention for the last decad